0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 1440 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 180 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:50:51 UTC 2026 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.15/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jYtq19k0Wj/E---3.1_1179510.p 84.56/14.67 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 84.56/14.67 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 84.56/14.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 84.56/14.67 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores 84.56/14.67 % Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 1179527 completed with status 0 84.56/14.67 % Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda 84.56/14.67 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 84.56/14.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 84.56/14.67 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores 84.56/14.67 % Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto) 84.56/14.67 % No SInE strategy applied 84.56/14.67 % Search class: HGHNF-FFMF22-MHHFFMBN 84.56/14.67 % partial match(1): HGHNF-FFMF22-SHHFFMBN 84.56/14.67 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 84.56/14.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1179530 completed with status 10 84.56/14.67 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 19s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 1179537 completed with status 0 84.56/14.67 % Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda 84.56/14.67 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 84.56/14.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 84.56/14.67 % Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores 84.56/14.67 % Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto) 84.56/14.67 % No SInE strategy applied 84.56/14.67 % Search class: HGHNF-FFMF22-MHHFFMBN 84.56/14.67 % partial match(1): HGHNF-FFMF22-SHHFFMBN 84.56/14.67 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 84.56/14.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1179530 completed with status 10 84.56/14.67 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 19s (1) cores 84.56/14.67 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 84.56/14.67 % Presaturation interreduction done 84.56/14.67 84.56/14.67 % Proof found! 84.56/14.67 % SZS status Theorem 84.56/14.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 84.56/14.67 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: $i > $o). 84.56/14.67 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 84.56/14.67 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 84.56/14.67 thf(decl_26, type, esk3_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 84.56/14.67 thf(decl_27, type, esk4_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 84.56/14.67 thf(decl_28, type, esk5_2: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 84.56/14.67 thf(decl_592, type, esk565_1: (($i > $i) > $i > $o) > $i). 84.56/14.67 thf(cTHM112D, conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)|(X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)))&![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ (X6 @ X8))<=(X1 @ X8))))<=((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X6 @ X4)|(X3 @ X6 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X6 @ X4)|(X3 @ X6 @ X4))))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X7 @ X4)|(X2 @ X7 @ X4))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jYtq19k0Wj/E---3.1_1179510.p', cTHM112D)). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X5)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)|(X3 @ (^[X5:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ X5))) @ X4)))&![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ (X6 @ X8))<=(X1 @ X8))))<=((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X6 @ X4)|(X3 @ X6 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X6 @ X4)|(X3 @ X6 @ X4))))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X7 @ X4)|(X2 @ X7 @ X4)))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM112D])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ X4)|(X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ X4)))&![X6:$i > $i, X7:$i > $i]:(((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X6 @ X4)|(X3 @ X6 @ X4)))&![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X7 @ X4)|(X2 @ X7 @ X4))))=>(![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ Z0))) @ X4)|(X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(X6 @ (X7 @ Z0))) @ X4)))&![X8:$i]:(((X1 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X6 @ X8))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X21:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X22:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X26:$i, X27:$i]:((((((X21 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X26)|(X22 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X26)|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22)))&((X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X27)|(X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X27)|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22))))&((((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22)))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22))))&(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22)))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22))))))&((((X21 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X26)|(X22 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X26)|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22)))&((X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X27)|(X21 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22) @ X27)|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22))))&((((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22)))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22))))&(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk5_2 @ X21 @ X22)))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ (esk3_2 @ X21 @ X22 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X21 @ X22))|~(X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X21 @ X22)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3) @ X4)|~((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3))))|~((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2))))))=(^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X4))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_4])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ X3))|~((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ X3 @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X37:($i > $i) > $i > $i > $i, X38:($i > $i) > $i > $i > $i]:((((X37 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))!=(X38 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1)))))))|((X37 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))!=(X38 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1)))))))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1)))) @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1)))))))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_5])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2))))) @ X4)=(X4))|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X5))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X37:($i > $i) > $i > $i > $i, X38:($i > $i) > $i > $i > $i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk5_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))|((X37 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))!=(X38 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1)))))))|((X37 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))!=(X38 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_7])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X4:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X37:($i > $i) > $i > $i > $i, X38:($i > $i) > $i > $i > $i]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X4)|((X37 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))!=(X38 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((X37 @ Z1 @ Z2)=(X38 @ Z1 @ Z2)))) @ Z0))) @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1)))))))|((X37 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))!=(X38 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1)))))))|((^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((X37 @ Z0 @ Z1)=(X38 @ Z0 @ Z1))))!=(^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])])]), c_0_10])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|(X3 @ (esk3_2 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)|~((X2 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)) @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X4:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X4)|((^[Z0:$i]:(esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((Z1)=(^[Z3:$i]:(Z3))))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z1:$i > $i, Z2:$i]:(((Z1)=(^[Z3:$i]:(Z3))))) @ Z0)))!=(^[Z0:$i]:(Z0))))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i]:((((esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2))))))=(^[Z0:$i]:(Z0)))|(X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X4))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_12])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X4:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X4)|((esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2))))) @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2))))) @ (esk565_1 @ X2)))!=(esk565_1 @ X2)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2))))) @ X4)=(X4))|(X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X5))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((X2 @ (esk3_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X4)|(X2 @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ (^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(^[Z2:$i]:(Z2)))))) @ X5))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_9])). 84.56/14.67 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_6])]), ['proof']). 84.56/14.67 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 84.56/14.67 % Parsed axioms : 1 84.56/14.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 84.56/14.67 % Initial clauses : 12 84.56/14.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 84.56/14.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12 84.56/14.67 % Processed clauses : 8757 84.56/14.67 % ...of these trivial : 14 84.56/14.67 % ...subsumed : 7237 84.56/14.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 1505 84.56/14.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 12937 84.56/14.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 84.56/14.67 % Backward-subsumed : 14 84.56/14.67 % Backward-rewritten : 0 84.56/14.67 % Generated clauses : 70240 84.56/14.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 56775 84.56/14.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 84.56/14.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5 84.56/14.67 % Paramodulations : 55827 84.56/14.67 % Factorizations : 30 84.56/14.67 % NegExts : 564 84.56/14.67 % Equation resolutions : 13022 84.56/14.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0 84.56/14.67 % Total rewrite steps : 70 84.56/14.67 % ...of those cached : 66 84.56/14.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 84.56/14.67 % Propositional check models : 0 84.56/14.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 84.56/14.67 % Propositional clauses : 0 84.56/14.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 84.56/14.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 84.56/14.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 84.56/14.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 84.56/14.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 84.56/14.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 84.56/14.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 84.56/14.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 84.56/14.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 1387 84.56/14.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2 84.56/14.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 84.56/14.67 % Negative unit clauses : 6 84.56/14.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 1379 84.56/14.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 48038 84.56/14.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 261741 84.56/14.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 84.56/14.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 118 84.56/14.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 394265 84.56/14.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 122194 84.56/14.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6920 84.56/14.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57 84.56/14.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 84.56/14.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 84.56/14.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 84.56/14.67 % Condensation attempts : 0 84.56/14.67 % Condensation successes : 0 84.56/14.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 57114732 84.56/14.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 324 84.56/14.67 84.56/14.67 % ------------------------------------------------- 84.56/14.67 % User time : 13.962 s 84.56/14.67 % System time : 0.062 s 84.56/14.67 % Total time : 14.024 s 84.56/14.67 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages 84.56/14.67 84.56/14.67 % ------------------------------------------------- 84.56/14.67 % User time : 13.963 s 84.56/14.67 % System time : 0.068 s 84.56/14.67 % Total time : 14.031 s 84.56/14.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 84.56/14.67 % E exiting 84.56/14.67 EOF